> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://orangius.gitbook.io/h4ck3r-w4y/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://orangius.gitbook.io/h4ck3r-w4y/tools-created/vulnerableapp/a04-insecure-design.md).

# A04 - Insecure Design

Insecure design refers to vulnerabilities arising from poor planning or a lack of security considerations in an application’s design phase. In this example, we have an insecure password recovery page that unintentionally reveals user information and lacks protections against brute-force attacks. Here’s how this vulnerability manifests and examples of insecure design choices.

#### Description of the Vulnerability

The password recovery page displays overly specific error messages that can help attackers identify valid users. When attempting to recover a password, the error message indicates whether or not a user exists in the system. Once a valid username is found, such as `administrateur`, an attacker can answer a "security question" to retrieve the password.

The design allows for unlimited attempts, meaning that an attacker could try every possible city in response to the security question without facing any account lockout or rate-limiting restrictions. In this case, by guessing the city `Paris`, we successfully retrieve the flag.

#### Examples of Insecure Design Choices

Here are additional insecure design examples that illustrate common security oversights:

1. **Insecure Secret Questions for Account Recovery**: Security standards discourage the use of secret questions, as they are often easily guessed or researched, offering minimal security.
2. **No Password Re-Prompt for Sensitive Actions**: Failing to prompt users to re-enter their password for actions like changing an email or password is a significant security risk, as it allows unauthorized individuals with access to the session to make critical changes.
3. **Lack of Protection Against Authentication Attacks**: Without a lockout mechanism or other protections, an attacker can attempt an excessive number of login attempts to guess credentials or gain access through brute force.
4. **Insecure "Forgot Password" Feature**: Insecure password recovery mechanisms may allow attackers to enumerate valid users and lack strong identification controls.

**Password Recovery Example**

In this case, the password recovery design flaw allows us to exploit the following sequence:

* Determine if a user exists based on error messages.
* Use a security question with an easily guessable answer, such as a city name.
* Submit guesses repeatedly without restriction until the correct answer (`Paris`) is identified, revealing the flag.

#### Broader Examples of Insecure Design

Insecure design isn’t limited to authentication flaws. Poorly conceived application designs can lead to a wide range of security issues, including:

* **Information Disclosure**: Application responses may inadvertently reveal sensitive information to unauthorized users.
* **Access Control Failures**: Improperly designed access controls can allow users to perform actions or view data beyond their permissions.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://orangius.gitbook.io/h4ck3r-w4y/tools-created/vulnerableapp/a04-insecure-design.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.